Oh dear. So… there are many reasons that I am very fond of Bardi, but it’s a rather frustrating language sometimes. This ranks pretty highly in both coolness and frustratingness.
There are a few ways of forming questions in Bardi. One is to use interrogative intonation. That’s a really wimpy way. The second is to stick [...]
Archive for the 'syntax' Category
(=)garda and (=)barda and =arda
June 20, 2008Categories: Bardi, fieldwork, syntax
Comments: Be the first to comment
Syntax … the mystery continues
June 12, 2008It was a day full of discovery today. I found a sound more painful than chalk on a blackboard (fork on frozen creamed corn…) and there was some new syntax.
Bardi has a lot of morphology that isn’t very productive. The case morphology is very regular but there’s a heap of derivational marking that occurs pretty [...]
Categories: Bardi, Laves, fieldwork, syntax
Comments: Be the first to comment
More syntactic mysteries
June 11, 2008Another excellently puzzling syntactic day today.
I’d been having trouble eliciting examples of gerunds with ’source’ case marking. They are mentioned in Nekes and Wurms’ Nyulnyul materials but I didn’t have any examples, and the examples I tried didn’t work. Somehow I got the idea that these forms might be resultative (I’m not sure if this [...]
Glossing
June 8, 2008I have to bite the bullet now and decide how to interlinearise my Bardi examples in the grammar. Most of my corpus isn’t interlinearised. I don’t need it, and I’ve been avoiding this for a while because there’s no good solution that I can see. These are the issues:
rampant post-affixal morphophonology (harmony, epenthesis, etc) which [...]
Categories: Bardi, syntax
Comments: 4 Comments
warrgam ngandan…
June 2, 2008just working-working, not much else to report at present, besides some wildlife and tamelife. I thought the snakes all came out in October, but I must be wrong about that given the number of baby king browns at the moment (seen one a day for 4 days now). I’m pretty sure that the gap under [...]
Categories: Bardi, fieldwork, syntax
Comments: 2 Comments
Syntactic intrigue…
June 1, 2008An intriguing session today*, in several ways. I was doing straightup elicitation and translation, which in itself is surprising since that hasn’t been very successful in the past, but it was working extremely well today.
Second, I got confirmation of the obviation (or better to call it quasi-obviation). Bardi has this thing where there are two forms [...]
Categories: Bardi, fieldwork, syntax
Comments: Be the first to comment
Cancellable predicates
May 23, 2008An off-chance English comment about ‘drowning’ led to an opportunitistic question or two. It turns out that Bardi has the same sort of cancellable semantics in certain predicates that have been reported for some Asian languages.
For example, in English, the sentence “He killed the dog, but it didn’t die” cannot be true in any [...]
Categories: Bardi, syntax
Comments: 5 Comments
Recent Comments