Language of the week: Burushaski
Continuing in alphabetical order*, this week’s language of the week (TM) is Burushaski, an isolate spoken in the Hunza valley and the area around Gilgit in Northern Pakistan. The Ethnologue gives the current population at about 87,000, but who knows if that’s reliable. There are a couple of different varieties, and just going by the lexicostatistical cognates given in the ethnologue entry, it’s not clear how many languages come under the name ‘Burushaski’ – probably 3 or so.
There seems to be quite a lot of oldish data for Burushaski on JSTOR. For example, there is some of Lorimer’s work, including a text, and a few articles on aspects of Burushaski grammar, such as this one on split ergativity and this one by Joan Baart on features of tonal languages in Northern Pakistan.
Burushaski is one of these languages which, because it is an isolate, is often attributed to one language family or another. This is especially appealing because Burushaski is both ergative and a tone language. Burushaski has been linked to Indo-European, Basque, Sumerian, and no doubt others that I haven’t yet come across. Such links are especially appealing, because until recently, we didn’t have very much information about this language that was easily accessible. the law of linkages has followed the rule I developed the Tasmanian languages: the less information we have about the language, the more likely it is to be related to something very far away.
I haven’t mentioned any of the print publications on Burushaski, but they include, in addition to Lorimer’s book, a rather nice 3-volume set by H Berger called Die Burushaski-Sprache von Hunza und Nager.
*Apologies for the delay in posting this – normally the languages of the week will be posted on Monday, but I was moving house.
March 27, 2007 at 2:06 pm
It is an informative article about Brushaski .Thank you
May 31, 2008 at 4:56 am
Just try to compare with Albanian.
July 16, 2008 at 8:11 pm
The non-linguistic works I’ve read on the Hunza (who speak Burushaski) seem to agree that the three varieties of the language are mutually intelligible.
July 17, 2008 at 5:12 am
Utterly different in vocabulary, grammar, and sound system. The grammar is pretty similar to Basque, Sumerian, and the Yeniseian languages, and vastly different from anything your poor Indo-European mind has ever imagined…
July 21, 2009 at 2:44 am
Dear Sir
My name is Aslam Nadeem and am from Hunza valley and student of M. phil/D. phil at Pakistan Study Centre university of Karachi and searchin origin of Burushaski langauge since ten year. on what basis you can say that “The grammar is pretty similar to Basque, Sumerian,” would you please answer me in detail?
Aslam Nadeem
aslam@yahoo.com
July 21, 2009 at 9:00 am
David was joking.
March 11, 2009 at 11:52 am
the next week, talk about basque, i can teach you!
mesedes, datorren astean ehizazueuskarari buruz, ni erakutsi dezaket